Exophthalmometry Technique & Instrumentation

What Exophthalmometry Measures

Exophthalmometry quantifies proptosis: the anterior protrusion of the globe relative to a fixed bony landmark of the orbit. The instrument in near-universal clinical use is the Hertel exophthalmometer, which uses a paired mirror system to measure the distance from the lateral orbital rim to the corneal apex in millimeters. The reading is referenced against the patient's own lateral orbital rims rather than an absolute external point, so both eyes are measured and compared against each other as well as against population norms.

Hertel Exophthalmometry Technique

Correct technique hinges on three details. Skip any one of them and the resulting error is large enough to change clinical interpretation:

• Base setting. The instrument's footplates rest on the lateral orbital rims, fixing a "base" distance between them. Record this base setting and reuse it at every follow-up visit. A changed base makes serial measurements uninterpretable, since an apparent shift in the proptosis reading may just reflect the different base rather than a true change in globe position.
• Mirror alignment. The examiner aligns the instrument's mirrors so that a red reference line seen in the mirror corresponds with the apex of the cornea; the position of that line on the millimeter scale gives the reading.
• Avoiding parallax. The examiner's eyes should be level with the patient's eyes during the measurement. A misaligned viewing angle introduces parallax error and skews where the corneal apex appears to sit on the scale.

Normal Values and Ethnic Variation

Average Hertel readings in Caucasian adults run approximately 16–17 mm, with the normal range spanning roughly 12–20 mm and symmetric measurements expected between the two eyes. Readings above roughly 20–21 mm exceed the typical upper limit and are considered true proptosis warranting further workup. Normal values run higher in individuals of African descent than in Caucasian individuals, so interpret a given absolute reading against that demographic variation rather than a single fixed cutoff for every patient.

Absolute size is not the only variable that matters clinically. An interocular asymmetry greater than 2 mm on exophthalmometry is clinically significant on its own and warrants workup for an orbital mass, thyroid eye disease, or another unilateral orbital process, even when both individual readings fall within the normal population range.

Alternative Devices: Luedde and Naugle

The Luedde exophthalmometer offers a simpler, inexpensive alternative: a direct, ruler-based design with no mirror system, placed directly against the lateral orbital rim and read by direct sighting. Without the mirror system's built-in alignment aid, it introduces more parallax error than the Hertel device in inexperienced hands, but its simplicity makes it a useful bedside or low-resource option.

The Naugle exophthalmometer solves a different problem. Patients with absent or asymmetric lateral orbital rims, whether from trauma, prior orbital fracture repair, or orbital surgery, cannot be reliably measured against the rim landmarks the Hertel device depends on. The Naugle instrument instead references the forehead and cheek, giving an alternative pair of fixed points when the standard bony landmarks are unusable.

Severe eyelid swelling, lid retraction, or restricted motility can make it impossible to seat any of these rim-referenced instruments correctly. Orbital CT offers a way around this. A reference line drawn between fixed bony landmarks on axial imaging takes the place of the external footplates, and proptosis is read as the perpendicular distance from that line to the corneal apex. Absolute values differ slightly from Hertel readings depending on exactly which landmarks and corneal surface a given study measures to, but reproducibility between observers is better, and the technique works regardless of eyelid position or orbital rim anatomy.

Related Topics

Continue exploring Clinical Examination Skills: